#
#
Home
About us
Publications
Issues
How we can help
Events
Latest news
Press Releases
How to join
Contact us
#
Quick links
Churchman
Church Society Trust
Cross+way
EV News

 General Synod Report 7 July 2006

Report on business from the General Synod in York

Friday 7 July 2006

The York group of sessions of the General Synod began at 4pm on Friday with the customary welcomes, introductions and reports on the progress of measures and statutory instruments.  This was followed by a debate on the report of the business committee.

The first substantial business of the Synod was a report on further education chaplaincies with the title “Pushing Further”.  A handful of contributors to the debate, including the Bishop of Southwark were critical of the assumptions about multi-faith chaplaincy but the report was adopted.

In the evening the Archbishop of Canterbury issued a statement on the Anglican Communion commenting particularly on the position of the Episcopal Church of the United States of America. 

Williams also made reference to the decision of the Church of Nigeria to appoint Martyn Minns as a Bishop in the US.  When the statement is unjumbled it appears that it says very little than that we must all keep on reflecting on what has happened.  A small group has been charged with analysing the response of ECUSA to the Windsor report and the Primates in order to report to the next meeting of the Primates in February 2007.  It is quite possible, if this group adopts the same approach as Williams, that they will conclude that ECUSA has met the requirements laid on it.

Because of the Archbishop’s statement question time was shortened and Synod apparently had little stomach to prolong it. Most interest was prompted by a question from Prudence Daly who wished to know after whom a pub in Paddington had been named, the pub in question is apparently called “The Mad Bishop and the Bear”. Pete Broadbent the Bishop of Willesden, who used to regularly change the colour of his hair, was given the task of responding. The gist of his answer seemed to be that no-one is entirely certain. Perhaps the naming was a general observation rather than with anyone specific in mind.

 

 

back to top

Related Links
Past News Reports
BulletPast News Reports
BulletNews 23 Nov 2010
BulletNews 24 Nov 2010
BulletNews 9 July 2010
BulletNews 10 July 2010
BulletNews 11 July 2010
BulletNews 12 July 2010
BulletNews 13 July 2010

BulletNews Jul 10
BulletNews Jul 11
BulletNews Jul 12
BulletNews Jul 13
BulletNews 9 Feb 2009
BulletNews 10 Feb 2009
BulletNews 11 Feb 2009
BulletNews 12 Feb 2009
BulletNews 13 Feb 2009

BulletNews 4 Jul 2008
BulletNews 5 Jul 2008
BulletNews 6 Jul 2008
BulletNews 7 Jul 2008
BulletNews 8 Jul 2008

BulletNews 11 Feb 2008
BulletNews 12 Feb 2008
BulletNews 13 Feb 2008
BulletNews 14 Feb 2008

BulletNews 6 Jul 2007
BulletNews 7 Jul 2007
BulletNews 8 Jul 2007
BulletNews 9 July 2007
BulletNews 10 Jul 2007

BulletNews 26 Feb 2007
BulletNews 27 Feb 2007
BulletNews 28 Feb 2007
BulletNews 1 Mar 2007

BulletNews 7 July 2006
BulletNews 8 July 2006
BulletNews 9 July 2006
BulletNews 10 July 2006
BulletNews 11 July 2006

BulletNews 6 Feb 2006
BulletNews 7 Feb 2006
BulletNews 8 Feb 2006
BulletNews 9 Feb 2006
BulletNews 15 Nov 2005
BulletNews 16 Nov 2005

BulletNews 8 Jul 2005
BulletNews 9 Jul 2005
BulletNews 10 Jul 2005
BulletNews 11 Jul 2005
BulletNews 12 Jul 2005

Segments

General Synod Pages
BulletIntroduction
BulletSynod Latest

General Synod - Other Sub Issues
BulletAgendas
BulletAnalysis of reports
BulletNews Reports

Other Issues
BulletDoctrine
BulletEthics
BulletLocal Church
BulletNational Church
BulletAnglican Communion
BulletMinistry
BulletHistory
BulletLiturgy
BulletEcumenical
BulletOther Faiths
BulletMiscellaneous

 Issues Sitemap
 List all issues
 search church society
Bullet Click for advanced search
Home | About us | Publications | Store | Issues | Events | Press releases
Membership | Contact us | Search | Links | Churchman | Church Society Trust | Cross+way